Why Human Creativity is Being Mistaken for AI—and What We Can Do About It. I'm writing this with all element of frustration from writing all night, only for AI detectors to flag it as its own.
There is something disturbing about using AI to detect AI. I use AI quite a bit and I think you can tell. I mean you, as a human, can tell. When the grammar is perfect, but the dots don't quite connect. When it only, almost, makes sense. Certain names and phrases that (*maybe, just maybe...*) get used constantly. And what do you do with heavily edited AI writing? Or lightly AI edited human writing? Maybe we should be looking for the meaning in what is written and not key phrases to try to decide if it was AI-generated? If a human reader can understand your meaning, does it matter how it was written?
I believe the gatekeeping should be around the ethics of the use of AI and not the detection of it mostly with AI. The concept of using AI to detect AI is very flawed because AI will mostly check for words and sentence patterns and not the construed meaning, emotions, and flow.
There is something disturbing about using AI to detect AI. I use AI quite a bit and I think you can tell. I mean you, as a human, can tell. When the grammar is perfect, but the dots don't quite connect. When it only, almost, makes sense. Certain names and phrases that (*maybe, just maybe...*) get used constantly. And what do you do with heavily edited AI writing? Or lightly AI edited human writing? Maybe we should be looking for the meaning in what is written and not key phrases to try to decide if it was AI-generated? If a human reader can understand your meaning, does it matter how it was written?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on it.
I believe the gatekeeping should be around the ethics of the use of AI and not the detection of it mostly with AI. The concept of using AI to detect AI is very flawed because AI will mostly check for words and sentence patterns and not the construed meaning, emotions, and flow.